Monday, December 22, 2008
PUSH BEYOND!
By November, 2008, with over 45lbs knocked off the scale (no- I didn't stick a screwdriver to it!), I picked up running again. One Sunday evening I was relaxing and gearing up for my "long" run of 5 miles the following morning when I found an issue of Runner's World magazine. On the cover was an amazing Navy Seal named David Goggins. David has done some incredible things; run over 200 miles at one time to profile one situation. Yeah- over 200 miles! Check out his story at http://www.davidgoggins.com/. After reading the article it hit me that David didn't have superhuman power (though some would rightfully argue he does). Instead, he wouldn't let himself quit. The article triggered a memory from my life. A time when training taught me to move beyond the point of pain and beyond the mind's desire to quit. Lately I have been shocked at how easily my mind will tell me to stop. And several of the excuses are legit. As some of you know, I have ulcerative colitis. It's the reason I am no longer in the Army. If you are unaware of what this is, suffice it to say UC is a pain in the ass- literally (gastro). It hit me hard and I allowed it to change my life. It also causes painful discomfort during a run. I've recently learned that something can make me hurt but it CANNOT make me stop; even something like UC. There is a point beyond that pain. A point my mind didn't want me to know about. The next morning my 5 mile run turned into 13.2 miles- a half marathon. The desire continued. I wanted to push more and more, beyond where I "thought" my limits were. The draw to know what was on the other side was too great. Just how far could I go after my mind said quit! How big of a lie was I really telling myself?
I'm very new to this distance running thing. I guess were in week 7 or 8 by now. Two weeks ago I ran a 30K. Next month I'm signed up for my first marathon. After that- who knows... what I do know is that I will continue to push through and NOT let my mind create limits where there are none.
So where are you today? Is it where you want to be? Physical, mental, spiritual, occupational, relational? Can't change where you are? Got an excuse? Join the crowd. Then look around at the crowd and sincerely ask yourself if this is where you really want to be. Now that you have that out of the way let's start pushing. Pretty soon you're going to get beyond that barrier and see what's on the other side!
PUSH BEYOND!
CRG
FYI- I've since been in touch with David. He appears to be a genuinely normal guy who simply does amazing things. He's friendly and humble. There certainly is a lot to be learned from him.
David- thanks again for the wake up call!
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Obama Fear Removal
1- Daniel 2:21; God is on His throne. This has not changed. Therefore, everything will be alright and frankly, there is nothing new under the son (Solomon).
2- Presidency; one of the biggest things that drove me nuts over the last 4 years was the Democratic Party cheering for Bush's downfall. Congratulations, you got it. Now look where we are as a country. We need to rise above this (as McCain instructed his followers to do). You measure the success of a coach by the success of the team. Obama is our new coach. We are the team. We should all be praying Obama has a hugely successful presidency! It has an absolute DIRECT impact on America.
3- Obama is not the Antichrist. Demons cower and retreat at the name of Christ. Whether you believe him or not, Obama claims to be a Christian. Do you see anywhere in scripture where the Antichrist could do anything but blasphemy the name of our Lord- he can NOT proclaim it! No, Obama is no more the Antichrist than George Bush, Bill Clinton or Ronald Regan were. Besides, we all know Bill Maher really is.
4- Abortion; abortion was a non-issue in this election. Obama refused to address it but votes pro-choice. McCain is a weak pro-life candidate. If with the House, Senate, Presidency and the campaign promise to overturn RvW, George Bush, a proclaimed Christian - could NOT overturn RvW, how much more success do we really think McCain would have with a Democratic House and Senate? No chance and likely not even an attempt. Oh yeah- and the infanticide thing. Manipulation. If you're interested in details I've read the bill and the associated legal briefs (I'm weird like that). I'm open to sharing those findings. That was nothing more than an attempt to make abortion an issue when it really wasn't. Bottom line, abortion laws were not going to change in the next term regardless of the candidate.
5- Taxes; taxes are going up. We have to deal with that. Believe me, I'm not a fan of it either. At the end of 2010 the top bracket goes from 35% to 39.6%. That was a Republican law that the Dems have no intention of changing. There is NO WAY McCain could have stopped the rise with a Dem House and Senate. At best, McCain could have negotiated for a 38% rate; still a tax increase. Will Obama increase taxes? Probably, but he doesn't have to. Bush already put that plan in place back in 2000.
6- Caring for one another; I'm not a fan of "redistribution". I live in America, not France, for a reason. We'll never have the type of socialist system they have but don't think we aren't already socialistic (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid). But let's not forget we are Christians. If someone asks for our shirt we are to give them our jacket. Why are we so paranoid about giving up some of what HE has given us to begin with. We should not be hostile and fearful because of it.
7- YOU ARE POOR! Dear Christian, you own nothing; at least you shouldn't. Everything you have in this world was given over to Him who has given you an ETERNAL gift. Your home, your car, your 401k, your knowledge- it is put in your care but it belongs to HIM. Do not be troubled by what you have or do not have in this world. He will care for you. Your reward is in Heaven, not this temporary place we reside in.
8- To those who are rich; meaning you own something. If you are not in poverty due to the fact you truly own things in this world then I encourage you to reconsider the grip you have on things that will fade. Everything you hold so tightly to will one day be gone. Embrace that which will not rust, fade, tarnished or can be stolen from you. Embrace Him who can provide so much more than you could ever dream of. Is there anything in life you can truly hold forever? Your goods, your money, your family, your love for anyone or anything? It can and will all fade away. But don't despair. There are some things that won't. Some things you CAN take with you. If you want to know more about these things and if you're open to having a serious and very real conversation about it. Let's talk.
- Charles
Friday, October 31, 2008
FIREPROOF
The premise of the movie is a couple that looks typical to the outside world. But that's the problem, they are typical. They can't communicate properly, they fail to prioritize each other and they are heading down the path to divorce. Yeah- this movie is a bit too typical unfortunately.
I'm an advocate of attending regular marriage promotion events (at least annually). It's just good to get the oil change periodically. I'm not saying Annette and I have the perfect marriage but there is no doubt these retreats have significantly strengthened our relationship. Fireproof is along these lines. So instead of attending a 5-8 hour event, I suggest you start with a 2 hour movie. It will be the best $15 you've spent in a long time... err- maybe $20...
ENJOY! Charles
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Bear Market Perspective
Habakkuk 3:17-18 "Though the fig tree may not blossom, Nor fruit be on the vines; Though the labor of the olive may fail, And the fields yield no food; Though the flock may be cut off from the fold, And there be no herd in the stalls— Yet I will rejoice in the LORD, I will joy in the God of my salvation."Economies and markets come and go but some things remain constant.
Spending Spree!!!
Original cost of Fannie/Freddie $200,000,000,000
US guarantee to JPM for Bear Stearns $29,000,000,000
2-yr loan to AIG $120,000,000,000
Exchange rate stability funds $50,000,000,000
Increase to FDIC $500,000,000,000 (Proposed)
Authorized Fannie/Freddie to buy mortgage backed securities $500,000,000,000
RTC type portfolio for banks $845,000,000,000
Pelosi/Obama stimulus package $115,000,000,000 (Proposed)
Hurricane and Flood Victims $24,000,000,000
Detroit Automakers $25,000,000,000
Heating for the poor $5,200,000,000
Budget Increases- Pentagon/Homeland Sec/Veterans Affairs $600,000,000,000
Since none of this money actually comes in the form of payment from an account but instead the printing of additional money people need to seriously consider how inflation will be impacted in the near future.
Bottom line: Dump your variable liabilities (ARMs, credit cards, HELOCs with variable, etc). The next 10 years could easily average an inflation rate double what we are currently seeing.
Take care,
Charles
I wake up and find I'm incredibly in debt!
1) Analyze your debt: know what you have, what rate it's at and what the monthly payments are. Get a free credit report (annually) and make sure it's accurate (www.freecreditreport.org).
2) Minimize debt growth: more than likely you've gotten used to spending on a credit card or some other unsecured method of debt. Break the habit by putting the cards away. In the freezer if you have to (this eliminates impulse spending since you literally have to wait for the card to thaw out!). Move to debit cards wherever you can. For existing credit cards, can you move to lower interest rates (without getting ripped off after the intro period)? Stop automatic bill payments that go directly to the cards. Can you trade for a less expensive vehicle?
3) Itemize your life: this is the part where planners (present company included) tell you to budget. In my experience, if you had a budget you wouldn't be asking this question. More than likely you are not going to just pick up a full blown budget tomorrow. So start with a snapshot. Get your card statements, checkbook, receipts, etc. Everything that indicates an expenditures for the last 30 days. Write it all down. Next, scratch EVERYTHING. Then rebuild your expense list beginning with the most critical things. This will help you prioritize your expenses. Begin eliminating the lowest priority items and try to continue moving up the list.
4) Crown cash king: For a period, start carrying cash again. Not big bills waiting to get robbed but begin paying for small purchases with cash again. This way, if you don't have it you don't spend it. Debit cards are great but we can still get lost in the idea of having a mystery amount of money out there.
5) Increase cash-flow: You've already removed those unnecessary expenditures. Now let's increase your take home. Reevaluate your job. Are you earning the appropriate amount? Is it possible to pick up some part-time or contract work during evenings or weekends? "Garage Sale" over EBay?
6) Reconsider strategies: This is controversial but it is my experience so here you go. People will liquidate and get penalized by taking out their long-term retirement money (401/IRA) in order to cover short-term cash flow needs. Until you get debt under control, suspend contributions to retirement and savings plans. Remember, short-term cash crisis needs must be satisfied in order for long-term savings plans to be realized. Also, if you own a home consider whether or not it is in your best financial interest. I've had clients sell their home and move to a smaller, more manageable place and get a hold of their debt. Make sure you have "emergency money" which may even include available balances on credit cards (911 only).
Just a few expense reduction ideas: * If you have roadside coverage via AAA or your dealership, see how it balances out to the one offered by your cell phone plan. Choose the best option.
Reduce your cell phone plan and use land lines more. Most people can save $20-$30 per month with this.
Change life insurance from cash value policies to much cheaper term policies (consult planner first).
Check web bulletin boards for advice before making major purchases. Compare prices and get consumer advice.
Get healthy: trade Starbucks for water... tap water. Eliminate fast food ($6-$8 and clogged arteries per visit).
Shop at discount stores like Big Lots and $ stores for basic household items- even cheaper than Walmart.
Check company websites for coupons before utilizing their services (ie- getting your car fixed by a national chain).
Hope this helps!
Charles
Who do you trust when shopping for a new Home Loan?
If, on the other hand, you are looking at increasing your overall net worth then you want to talk to a mortgage planner. They see the big picture and don't make you sacrifice your long-term wealth potential for their short-term commission. A mortgage planner will have you consider the asset and liability side of your books and treat a mortgage appropriately. If you need one let me know and I can make a suggestion. I've felt comfortable referring my clients to him in the past and he has done a good job.
Charles
Do you have some tips to help save money on wedding costs?
Charles
Out of the box thinking. Is it good or bad for the team?
1) Out of the box thinkers are different. Often they are A-type personalities and driven to succeed. They need to be aware that they have a strong tendency to become overwhelming. Their comments and discussion points need to be tempered with a heavy dose of patience and respect for other team members. This can be difficult if they feel like they are the only one that "sees" the real answer. When a member hits that point they need to close the ONE mouth they have and use the TWO ears they were given before going any farther. Quite often teams are balanced with out of the box thinkers and those who live in and for the box. It's not a bad thing but the two have to understand each other. The team will have trouble when these two individuals cannot see the other's perspective and the project essentially becomes a turf war. This is where strong leadership is crucial.
2) You can argue a decision only until the final decision is made. Once the decision is made team members have to stop the debating and get on the same page. This may be a time for out of the box thinkers to calmly and quietly make their way back to the box. If your organization is running in circles it's probably because your leaders are not leading. If this is you and your company then I am going to suggest an expert/website in leadership training that your organization may want to have a conversation with.
www.theliveinstitute.org
Charles
Whether to pay off the mortgage
Here's something else to consider. You said you WANTED to pay off some part of your mortgage. You may really want to do this but are concerned you might be making a mistake. No, it's not a bad idea. You wouldn't be doing anything "financially-wrong". If you will sleep easier and it will give you a greater piece of mind- pay down the mortgage.
For the record, I run a financial planning firm. So I guess I would have to respectfully disagree with the other comments about advisors never suggesting you pay down the mortgage.
Charles
Top 3 Qualities When Considering Promotions
2) Continuity- I look to promote a person who is, for all intents and purposes, already doing the job I am considering them for
3) Compatibility- What are their career goals? Is this promotion in line with their goals? If it is, then they will have a greater buy-in. This should result in better performance.
As for your other question- yes, I absolutely foresee more growth for my company and greater hiring/retention budgets.
Charles
What do you do with your ideas?
Book recommendation: Hoover's Vision by Gary Hoover. Great book for those that think differently.
Hope that helps, CRG
Should I get a mortgage?
Mortgage or no mortgage- who cares. Instead, think NET WORTH. When your end financial goal is to increase your personal net worth then all purchasable items become one of two things: an asset or a liability. Both should be used with the goal of increasing net worth. 4 years ago I would have said, take the mortgage. Why? Because you could get a low cost mortgage locked in for 10 years at 4-ish% then invest in a high quality fixed instrument for the same term at 5-ish%. Then you could write off the interest (to an extent). The bottom line was that you had your bond paying your mortgage and you were able to net money off the spread... thus, increasing net worth. Some people may gripe about this strategy but the fact is I did it for a client and it continues to work exactly the way we planned it. Today you're not going to find the fixed 4% mortgage or the high quality 5% income product. No, if given a choice I would not do the mortgage in today's environment.
Another component. With the above strategy you only use low risk products. You wouldn't use an adjustable mortgage and you would ONLY use high quality fixed investments. You need equal amount of risk on each side to properly counter balance your leverage (mortgage). You cannot offset the potential risk involved with using the stock market (US or non-US). So I would have to recommend against the strategy you described. As for advisors, get advice from someone who is referred to you by a trusted source. Make sure their fees are reasonable and they know what they are talking about. I recommend only using someone with the CFP credentials behind their name. I wouldn't stress about what "type" they are (ie- commission, fee based, fee only, etc). After 10 years in the business I've seen good, bad and ugly on all sides. The PERSON brings integrity, not the firm, the designation or the type of practice they run.
Hope that helps, CRG”
What do you do with your 401k after you reach age 70 1/2 and you are retired?
Texas Supreme Court
How unbiased do you consider an elected body made up entirely of one political party? How much debate and consideration is given to decisions when that body unanimously agrees with itself over 90% of the time? Herein lies my struggle. In Texas, Republicans have taken total control of the Supreme Court; 9 for 9 seats. This may sound odd coming from a conservative voter who votes, most of the time, for the Republican seat. Consider what this group has looked like on paper:
- The court overturned decisions made by juries in consumer cases 81% of the time
- The court ruled against consumers 84% of the time in their last term
- The court overturned 92% of appellate court decisions
- The court overturned 70% of trial court opinions
- Between 60-75% of each individual justice's campaign finance comes from law firms and energy/natural resource companies.
[Source: www.tpj.com Texans for Public Justice]
Was some of this necessary- I'm certain it was. But the numbers are overwhelmingly against consumers. The overturning of civil jury decisions is alarming- why even have a trial by jury? One could make an argument on that but trial by jury is how our system is run.
I am all for tort reform. The most common discussion around tort reform is the capping of punitive damages, or punishment for bad/non-criminal behavior. The fact is too many times someone purposely drops a can of spaghetti sauce at a local grocery store then lays next to it feigning injury. Before you know it the grocery store is being sued for ridiculous amounts. Many trial lawyers certainly have their pockets filled by unscrupulous claims. Sadly, even for legitimate claims several lawyers aren't fighting for what's fair- they fight for what's possible (I'm referring to awards). There is abuse out there and it should be prevented where possible.
On the other side, I think we can all agree that not every company out there is completely ethical. It's true that SOME company leaders will lie, steal, cheat and defraud in order to make profits. Not that we've seen any of that lately! If a company with an unethical decision maker develops a bad product they will consider the consequences. Say the company can reign in $100 million in profits with this product. They learn of the defect or bad process and consider how much it would cost them. A recall could eliminate the entirety of those profits. A lawsuit could not only cost them the profits but could also jeopardize company assets through potential punitive damages awarded by a jury. In this case the company is better off doing the recall and the consumer is safer.
Now consider for a moment if we had a limit to punitive damages. What if the cap was, say- $10 million in punitive damages. Well, our unethical company considers the worst case scenario. $100 million in profits minus up to $10 million in damages = $90 million in profits if we get caught! The profits or the total loss via a recall? The unethical company will take the profits.
We don't have caps on punitive damages here in Texas at this time. But instead of a cap we have a Supreme Court that seems to be more than willing to institute its own version of tort reform (a job for the legislative branch by the way). The Texas Court is overturning decisions that include punitive damages awarded by juries at an alarming rate. While it is not an outright cap it certainly makes life easier for our unethical company since they know that even if they lose a judgement and incur large punitive damages for their ill behavior- they can appeal to a friendly Supreme Court which appears all too willing to reverse the lower courts' decisions.
Is the jury trial system really being used? Are companies really being held accountable? Are we, as consumers, really that much safer?
I suggest two items for consideration:
- Eliminate elections for Supreme Court justices. The "tainted" level is ALARMING. "Tainted" is the descriptive used when one of the lawyers presenting to the court has given money to one of the justice's campaigns. In business we call that a kickback! Instead, initiate appointed positions like we do on the Federal level (FYI- many states have adopted this with mixed success).
- Tort reform should be initiated but with limits of "% of profits affiliated with the ill-behaviour" instead of an outright dollar figure.
I certainly don't want a Democratic Supreme Court in Texas. But I don't feel very confident with an all-Republican one either. For this reason I'll be voting for two Democrats in this year's Supreme Court Justice (Houston and Yanez for those interested). Maybe with some difference of opinions the court will begin to have a little less bias in its decisions.
Thanks for listening. Feel welcome to reply. Overall, it's just intended as food for thought,
Charles